, ,

Is it a plane, a bird, a telephone, no it's a door key

By    John Garner on  Sunday, August 6, 2006
Summary: Well looking at the myKey 2300 you would maybe think that it was a telephone, but the clue is that it's missing a door. The MyKey 2300 is an RFID lock that requires a RFID card and shazam your door opens on it's own. They have even thought of adding a keypad that slides open […]

Well looking at the myKey 2300 you would maybe think that it was a telephone, but the clue is that it's missing a door. The MyKey 2300 is an RFID lock that requires a RFID card and shazam your door opens on it's own. They have even thought of adding a keypad that slides open should you have lost your card.
Loose something me ? Never ! 🙂

My Key Knob RFID styleMy Key Chain RFID style

There is even the possibility to press a battery up against the door knob, should the AA batteries it runs off die on you. I doubt I'll ever have one of these but it does seem to have been nicely thought through !

Check the MyKey 2300 web site out

Article written by  John Garner

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment on “Is it a plane, a bird, a telephone, no it's a door key”

  1. I just realised looking at this, that the two round metal points are probably where you can press the battery against should you're AA batteries in the device run out !

    And what happens when you have lost your key and you're not carrying the appropriate 9v battery? (that fits the two metal rounded bits?) around with you ? LOL 😉

    Well I suppose that means like my alarm system that a burglar can't just cut the electricity to open the door !

    John

Recent Posts

Check out the most recent posts from the blog: 
Wednesday, June 18, 2025
The ONHT Framework for Intermediate users
John Garner
No Comments

This Intermediate Guide for the ONHT (Objective, Needs, How, Trajectory) Framework transforms you from someone who uses GenAI into someone who thinks with GenAI by adding the missing cognitive functions that current GenAI lacks. The framework works through three critical pillars – Empathy (understanding all stakeholders), Critical Thinking (challenging assumptions), and Human in the Loop (active partnership). Master these patterns and you'll be solving complex problems others can't even approach, becoming indispensable by designing interactions that produce exceptional results rather than just functional outputs.

Read More
Monday, June 16, 2025
The ONHT Framework: Beginners Guide
John Garner
No Comments

Stop getting generic AI responses. Learn the four-letter framework that transforms vague requests into precise results. The ONHT framework: Objective (what problem you're solving), Needs (key information that matters), How (the thinking approach), and Trajectory (clear steps to the answer), teaches you to think WITH AI, not through it, turning "analyse customer feedback" into board-ready insights. Real examples show how adding context and structure gets you from Level 1 basics to Level 3 mastery, where AI delivers exactly what you need.
The difference? Knowing how to ask.

Read More
Sunday, June 15, 2025
The ONHT Framework: GenAI Prompting Solutions That Actually Work for People
John Garner
No Comments

GenAI tools are transforming work, but most people get poor results because they don't understand how to communicate with AI built on structured data. This guide is a series of articles that teaches the ONHT framework—a systematic approach to prompting that transforms vague requests into exceptional outputs by focusing on Objectives (what problem), Needs (what information), How (thinking approach), and Trajectory (path to solution). Master this framework and develop an expert mindset grounded in human-in-the-loop thinking, critical analysis, and empathy, and you'll excel with any AI tool, at any company, in any role.

Read More
Sunday, September 24, 2023
The reliability & accuracy of GenAI
John Garner
No Comments

I question the reliability and accuracy of Generative AI (GenAI) in enterprise scenarios, particularly when faced with adversarial questions, highlighting that current Large Language Models (LLMs) may be data-rich but lack in reasoning and causality. I would call for a more balanced approach to AI adoption in cases of assisting users, requiring supervision, and the need for better LLM models that can be trusted, learn, and reason.

Read More
crossmenuarrow-down