La simplicité est une chose merveilleuse, dans la vie, dans les objets qu'on utilise tous les jours, mais surtout chez les gens qu'on côtoie tous les jours. Etre avec des gens qui sont simples, dans leurs interactions avec les autres, rend la vie plus agréable. Une ancienne connaissance m'a expliqué que l'interface de l'iPod était vraiment compliqué et difficile à comprendre pour elle. Je me suis rendu compte dans son cas, qu'elle tentait de rendre compliqué son quotidien, sans doute par habitude, jusque dans son interaction avec son entourage. C'est quelqu'un de compliqué qui dira souvent que les autres sont compliqués, sans doute comme mécanisme de défense. C'était un signe, mais c'est aussi une tendance, de vouloir toujours rajouter des fonctionnalités dans un produit, rajouter des signes de connaissances 'intellectuelles' dans une conversation, porter des vêtements extravagants pour ne pas paraitre simple, être différent etc.
Pensée du jour...
I question the reliability and accuracy of Generative AI (GenAI) in enterprise scenarios, particularly when faced with adversarial questions, highlighting that current Large Language Models (LLMs) may be data-rich but lack in reasoning and causality. I would call for a more balanced approach to AI adoption in cases of assisting users, requiring supervision, and the need for better LLM models that can be trusted, learn, and reason.
I discuss my experience with chatbots, contrasting older rules-based systems with newer GenAI (General Artificial Intelligence) chatbots. We cannot dismiss the creative capabilities of GenAI-based chatbots, but these systems lack reliability, especially in customer-facing applications, and improvements in the way AI is structured could lead to a "software renaissance," potentially reducing society's technical debt.
The article discusses the contrasting debate on how AI safety is and should be managed, its impact on technical debt, and its societal implications.
It notes the Center for AI Safety's call for a worldwide focus on the risks of AI, and Meredith Whittaker's criticism that such warnings preserve the status quo, strengthening tech giants' dominance. The piece also highlights AI's potential to decrease societal and technical debt by making software production cheaper, simpler, and resulting in far more innovation. It provides examples of cost-effective open-source models that perform well and emphasizes the rapid pace of AI innovation. Last, the article emphasises the need for adaptive legislation to match the pace of AI innovation, empowering suitable government entities for oversight, defining appropriate scopes for legislation and regulation, addressing ethical issues and biases in AI, and promoting public engagement in AI regulatory decisions.
Japan has made its ruling on the situation between Content creators and Businesses. Japanese companies that use AI have the freedom to use content for training purposes without the burden of copyright laws. This news about the copyright laws in Japan reported over at Technomancers is seen as Businesses: 1 / Content Creators: 0 The […]