Facebook comes clean...

By    John Garner on  Saturday, February 21, 2009
Summary: So whatever you share with Facebook belongs to Facebook, we thought you would like to know... In a few words that is what you'll find in Facebook's updated "Terms of Service". According to Kara Swisher, its pretty much a 'hey, if you share something especially on social networks you are asking for it' type sermon: […]

So whatever you share with Facebook belongs to Facebook, we thought you would like to know... In a few words that is what you'll find in Facebook's updated "Terms of Service". According to Kara Swisher, its pretty much a 'hey, if you share something especially on social networks you are asking for it' type sermon:

"You Have Zero Privacy Anyway. Get Over It”–That Goes Double on Social Networks"..."That means once you send something to others, it is out there in cyberspace forever, never ever to return. And that goes double on social-networking sites, where–let’s be honest–people egregiously overshare and then get all righteous when it is explained to them that sharing means, um, sharing."

I guess it all seems logical doesn't it. I mean newspapers and magazines post pictures of celebrities in invariably embarrassing situations and once it is out there, it is out there... and you never see them being asked for compensation by the celebrities so this would clearly not have anything to do with Facebook covering themselves. Probably wouldn't be about dealing with requests to remove images from current or former facebook members either.
No, you're correct Kara, it is only about stating the obvious, being logical about the whole thing, to as our friend Mark puts it, 'be open about the whole thing'.
Being upfront and coming clean is good. So if there is a problem, don't call us, it's your own fault for sharing in the first place.

Another issue here is what happens as a member of a community when you leave, do you have a right to request all the data you added, contributed be removed or accept that it remains. Giving the people the choice does seem to make more sense to me instead of deciding for them. From experience a lot of people don't actually use such functions and may feel leaving their data is like a posthumous stance! Would I be cynical in thinking that Facebook may feel they could then be missing valuable contributions by letting people remove the data? In some cases you are talking about removing a lot of data that otherwise needs to be stored and the cost involved with storing it.

Twitter currently allows me to remove all data I posted, should I delete the account. Maybe Twitter is a far more 'in the moment' service and it would hence make less sense, relying on people's collective memories, rather than stored data...

So, nice attitude. Clever strategic analysis. Great PR spin on the whole thing to make it all sound logical...

Article written by  John Garner

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

Check out the most recent posts from the blog: 
Wednesday, June 18, 2025
The ONHT Framework for Intermediate users

This Intermediate Guide for the ONHT (Objective, Needs, How, Trajectory) Framework transforms you from someone who uses GenAI into someone who thinks with GenAI by adding the missing cognitive functions that current GenAI lacks. The framework works through three critical pillars – Empathy (understanding all stakeholders), Critical Thinking (challenging assumptions), and Human in the Loop (active partnership). Master these patterns and you'll be solving complex problems others can't even approach, becoming indispensable by designing interactions that produce exceptional results rather than just functional outputs.

Read More
Monday, June 16, 2025
The ONHT Framework: Beginners Guide

Stop getting generic AI responses. Learn the four-letter framework that transforms vague requests into precise results. The ONHT framework: Objective (what problem you're solving), Needs (key information that matters), How (the thinking approach), and Trajectory (clear steps to the answer), teaches you to think WITH AI, not through it, turning "analyse customer feedback" into board-ready insights. Real examples show how adding context and structure gets you from Level 1 basics to Level 3 mastery, where AI delivers exactly what you need.
The difference? Knowing how to ask.

Read More
Sunday, June 15, 2025
The ONHT Framework: GenAI Prompting Solutions That Actually Work for People

GenAI tools are transforming work, but most people get poor results because they don't understand how to communicate with AI built on structured data. This guide is a series of articles that teaches the ONHT framework—a systematic approach to prompting that transforms vague requests into exceptional outputs by focusing on Objectives (what problem), Needs (what information), How (thinking approach), and Trajectory (path to solution). Master this framework and develop an expert mindset grounded in human-in-the-loop thinking, critical analysis, and empathy, and you'll excel with any AI tool, at any company, in any role.

Read More
Sunday, September 24, 2023
The reliability & accuracy of GenAI

I question the reliability and accuracy of Generative AI (GenAI) in enterprise scenarios, particularly when faced with adversarial questions, highlighting that current Large Language Models (LLMs) may be data-rich but lack in reasoning and causality. I would call for a more balanced approach to AI adoption in cases of assisting users, requiring supervision, and the need for better LLM models that can be trusted, learn, and reason.

Read More
crossmenuarrow-down