After having recently posted about the joke-site "don't press the red button" I was amused to discover an extremely serious experience/study over at www.dontclick.it. Yes Don't Click It, spelled the geeky way, in a domain name way.
The site is not only an experience for the creators, it's a real and novel experience for the visitors. When a trigger happy, sorry, clicker happy person comes across a site like this, it is pretty difficult to withhold the natural click instincts that have set in over the years.
As you can see here, there are little sequences that require the user to understand how to navigate the site without clicking. The sequences are very professional and well thought out. As they say in French 'chapeau' (I take my hat off to you !)...
This screenshot shows how you may be asked to say whether you miss clicking :
But it's all a trick, and I got caught. They ask you whether you were frustrated, not being able to use the click. So you click to say yes, and, damn you get told off, because you previously were asked not to click ! Clever, clever, this is starting to remind me of the "don't push the red button" joke (also in Flash) LOL ;). Must be a Flash sense of humour thing !
The site is really well designed, the idea is brilliant and the final product is superb. Now go take a look and let's see how good you are 🙂
Go take a look at www.dontclick.it
I question the reliability and accuracy of Generative AI (GenAI) in enterprise scenarios, particularly when faced with adversarial questions, highlighting that current Large Language Models (LLMs) may be data-rich but lack in reasoning and causality. I would call for a more balanced approach to AI adoption in cases of assisting users, requiring supervision, and the need for better LLM models that can be trusted, learn, and reason.
I discuss my experience with chatbots, contrasting older rules-based systems with newer GenAI (General Artificial Intelligence) chatbots. We cannot dismiss the creative capabilities of GenAI-based chatbots, but these systems lack reliability, especially in customer-facing applications, and improvements in the way AI is structured could lead to a "software renaissance," potentially reducing society's technical debt.
The article discusses the contrasting debate on how AI safety is and should be managed, its impact on technical debt, and its societal implications.
It notes the Center for AI Safety's call for a worldwide focus on the risks of AI, and Meredith Whittaker's criticism that such warnings preserve the status quo, strengthening tech giants' dominance. The piece also highlights AI's potential to decrease societal and technical debt by making software production cheaper, simpler, and resulting in far more innovation. It provides examples of cost-effective open-source models that perform well and emphasizes the rapid pace of AI innovation. Last, the article emphasises the need for adaptive legislation to match the pace of AI innovation, empowering suitable government entities for oversight, defining appropriate scopes for legislation and regulation, addressing ethical issues and biases in AI, and promoting public engagement in AI regulatory decisions.
Japan has made its ruling on the situation between Content creators and Businesses. Japanese companies that use AI have the freedom to use content for training purposes without the burden of copyright laws. This news about the copyright laws in Japan reported over at Technomancers is seen as Businesses: 1 / Content Creators: 0 The […]
[...] If you enjoyed Don’t click it you’ll like this [...]